This results in high throughput and at the same time provides redundancy. Attention reader Don’t stop learning now. I'm just trying to get some input as what might be seen if we go to either a 100/100 or 150/150. The Cisco ASA 5500 series has models: Cisco ASA 5505, Cisco ASA 5510, Cisco ASA 5515-X, Cisco ASA 5520, Cisco ASA 5525-X, Cisco ASA 5540, Cisco ASA 5550, Cisco ASA 5555-X, Cisco ASA 5585-X. Yes, I know the test sites are largely to be taken with at least a grain of salt.

My question/concern is about one of the users going to one of the broadband speed test sites and not seeing what they had with the 5505 at the 75/75 test. Would it be unreasonable to expect the 5506 not to be able to handle a higher bandwidth connection? This would be only from a web-browsing perspective. Check CISCO ASA 5505 Series ASA5505-K8 Enterprise Firewall bundle specifications, interfaces/ports, form factor, memory/storage, connectivity, Cisco ASA5505-K8 firewall throughput, protection, power supply and voltage. I see the IPS throughput spec on the ASA5506-X at 150Mbps, where the ASA5505 is at 75Mbps. Let's start with the premise that the business functions they have now working on the 5505 with the 25/25 connection will continue to work as they do now on the 5506 at some higher speed connection. My question revolves around a larger number of casual users (see my last paragraph). These firewalls are used and trusted by small and midsize businesses with one or a few locations.Enterprise class security. But again, all this is in the scope of a handful of people. There is some remote access and VPN work being done. Regarding the business needs, there are only a handful of users ever onsite for a vast majority of the time. This is not a traditional 9-5 business location.

Cisco asa 5505 throughput